During a recent expert testimony cross-examination, opposing counsel asked me if my analysis conformed to GAAP? This was part and parcel of several foundational questions posed to me, likely to seize an opening in which to inquire, and potentially cast doubt on my financial analysis. I looked at opposing counsel standing at the lectern with his head down reading from his notes and responded, “No.” Right away, he looked up and started down a series of questions with the idea of challenging and casting doubt on my work. Questions were shorter, to the point, expecting quick, yet defensive answers and his chance to challenge the financial expert.
Learn more about this topic by Jon DeMoss as seen in Insights by Brady Ware.
Read the complete article here.
Disclaimer: The views, opinions or examples included in the linked article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect an official policy or position of ASA or its members.